Skip to main content

Work With Practices

Practice Projects And Case Studies

Most of what goes wrong in a practice is a handful of recurring problems: a provider added without the payer work finishing, a contract that quietly stopped working, records that no longer agree after a business change, staff working around a system nobody owns. Here are four of those, and what it took to fix each one.

Practice Growth Consulting

Five Months Of Denials Cleared Before This Practice Added Its Next Provider

Five payer applications for one October start, an office added to the existing contracts, and a payer that confirmed the new location then never loaded the group contract. Also two problems that looked like billing and were not.

See The Group Practice Project

Practice Operations And Workflows

Rebuilding A Practice’s Digital Systems, Workflows, And Automation

Anyone who opens a shared file can change it, and nobody does it on purpose. Ninety-seven approved masters that staff can use but cannot overwrite, with access matched to each role across two SharePoint sites.

See The Systems Project

Payer And Billing Transition Support

Transferring A Solo Practitioner Into Their Own Corporation

Four insurers wanted the same change five different ways: two portals, two emails, and a fax. One payment enrollment came back denied purely because the insurer had not loaded the new Tax ID yet.

See The Payer Transition

Spravato Operations

A Scheduling Tool Built Around The Staff Workflow

Scheduling an esketamine patient means knowing the authorization dates, the chair time left, and the follow up status at the same moment, and no single screen showed all three. So we watched the work first, then built the view.

See The Scheduling Project

Finding Record Conflicts Before Four Payer Changes

Before any payer work starts, the practice’s own records have to agree with each other. On another provider engagement we checked the W-9, the organization NPI, the state business record, and the DataSpring provider profile (formerly CAQH) against one another, and they did not match. Sorting that out first is cheaper than having four payers reject the same application for four different reasons. We verified the organization NPI update, documented what still needed correcting, built a payer specific start sheet, and prepared the PacificSource change packet. The four payer scope covered Moda, Aetna, PacificSource, and Regence.

Credentialing Start Map
  • Match the legal business name, Tax ID, organization NPI, and DataSpring practice record.
  • Keep the Moda, Aetna, PacificSource, and Regence requirements in separate payer rows.
  • Record the owner action, submission route, latest status, and next follow up for each payer.

A public summary of the project map. Provider identifiers and private account information are omitted.

See New Provider Credentialing

What Does Your Practice Need Next?

Pick a defined package for credentialing or operational work, or tell us about a project that needs a written scope first.

Next Step

Know What This Would Cost For Your Practice.

Every service has a published price and a written scope. If you are not sure which one fits, ask and you will be pointed at the right one.